Search for: "Sunglass Designs, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 4:04 am
The mark VICTORY for "sunglass lenses" was refused registration in view of the registered mark VICTORY COLLECTION & Design (shown below) for, inter alia, sunglasses and sunglass frames [COLLECTION disclaimed].The Board found the word VICTORY to be the dominant portion of the cited mark. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:12 am
The case is titled Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
So Oakley, Inc. learned when it attempted to oppose the design mark shown below, for sunglasses and sunglass cases.The Board refused to institute the opposition, as stated in a communication from TTAB paralegal Karl Kochersperger (here):"Each opposer is required to serve a copy of its notice of opposition on the applicant, at the correspondence address of record in the USPTO and must include proof of such service with its notice of opposition at the time of… [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
Maui Jim, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:12 pm
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:59 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – Vera Bradley Designs, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 10:38 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – The Plaintiff, Oakley, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 3:14 am
In re Alison Raffaele Cosmetics, Inc., Serial No. 77325348 (August 16, 2013) [not precedential] [Refusal to register FRUTTA DI VITA for "Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Concealers; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations," in view of the registered mark FRÜT A VIE for "Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Wrinkle… [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.November 4, 2014 - 11 AM: In re Design Solutions International, Inc., Serial Nos. 85812685 and 85815392 [Section 2(d) refusal of DSI and DSI DESIGN SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC for "ceiling lights, chandeliers, electric lamps, electric lighting fixtures, lighting fixtures, lamps" on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark DSI for "infrared… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:20 am
South Bend, IN - Trademark lawyers for Coach, Inc. of New York, New York filed a trademark and copyright infringement suit in the Northern District of Indianaalleging The Treasure Box, Inc. of Elkhart, Indiana infringed the Coach's registered trademarks and copyrights, including the copyrighted works known as the "Coach Design Elements" including the SIGNATURE C DESIGNS, Registration No. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:23 am
Kangaroo Mf’g Inc., No. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
Pacific Trade (sunglasses); Nike v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
Pacific Trade (sunglasses); Nike v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
"] Kona USA, Inc. v. [read post]
Religious Discrimination Claim Moves Ahead Against Loan Company Denying Entry To Woman Wearing Hijab
25 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
Advance America Cash Advance Centers Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm
Agents also seized over 25 luxury purses, more than 100 pairs of designer shoes, over 100 pairs of jeans, more than 20 pairs of designer sunglasses, four flat screen televisions, two computers, and a high-end refrigerator—all purchased with fraud proceeds. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
In the following weeks, Maxx Tan surrendered various purses, a pair of sunglasses and a sunglasses case to the police, all of which bore the Coach mark. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
April 17, 2007); Magical Mile, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:40 am
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:51 am
(Assembly of Sunglasses Was Not Fgn Base Co Sales Inc.)2. [read post]
